Properties
| ID | 121240 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Person |
| Case Study | Byzantino-Serbian Border Zones in Transition (1282–1355) , Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Sex | Male |
Description
Mentioned in the first (1334/1336), second and third charter (1343/1345) of the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan for the Monastery of Treskavec. He bought an 100 kьbьl large estate in Galičane. The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated his property in Galičane to the Treskavec Monastery (Město vь Galičanehь kupenica Panaretova kьblomь r. plisiastь sevastь Pečkopulь i Strězo Madarakь).
literature
Adžievski 1994 — 196-197 , Kravari 1989 — 262 , Purković 1939/40 — 77 , Slaveva/Mošin 1981 — 81, art. 7. 116, art. 28. 151, art. 84 , Slaveva/Mošin 1988 — 107Relations
Actors (2)
| Name | Class | Begin | End | Relation Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byzantines | Group | ||||
| Greeks | Group |
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |