Maps of Power

Soprьstь

Properties

ID	121174
System Class	Person
Sex	Male

Description

Mentioned in the second and third charter (1343/1345) of the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan for the Monastery of Treskavec. He had a brother and a family. The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated a fishing spot in Nakolьcь at the lake Prespa with a river, field, garden and fruit trees, to the Monastery of Treskavec. He endowed it with fishermen. One of them was Soprьstь with his brother and his family (Lovište u Prěspě Nakolьcь s ribari, s rěkomь, s niviemь, z gradinomь, ovoštïemь; imena rybaremь Soprьstь z bratiōmь i s rodomь mu).

literature

Adžievski 1994 — 197, n. 73 , Adžievski 1997 — 17 , Angelov 1958 — 160 , Kravari 1989 — 368-369 , Pjanka 1970 — 132 , Slaveva/Mošin 1981 — 123, art. 83. 147, art. 34

Relations

Sources (2)

Name	Class	Description
Treskavac 2	Source	The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3).
Treskavac 3	Source	The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3).