Dolь Evrěisky
Begin 01.09.1343
End 31.08.1345
End 31.08.1345
Properties
| ID | 1935 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Place |
| Place | Ethnic Quarter |
| Case Study | Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Administrative unit | Region of Pelagonia / Пелагониски регион , North Macedonia |
| Historical place | Kingdom of Serbia |
Description
King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan mentioned a Jewish quarter in the vicinity of the fair of Prilep (Pilevěmь dvoromь, kьblomь .d. mь; tako i sь Kovačevěmь dvorištemь blizь ně, takožde i prěz Dolь Evrěisky blizь Arьseně, kьblu jedinomu). In the year 1344/45 the King mentioned the Jewish quarter again near the fair of Prilep (Panigirište, počьnь ōtь Dola Evrěiska svěne dvorišta Arseneva, do dvora Petralětova i do urvišta Svetye Varvary). The Jewish quarter was indicated a second time in the third charter, insofar as Dušan mentioned it in the donation of a meadow near to the Jewish quarter.
literature
Babić 1969a — 6Relations
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |