Црква Свете Петке
Properties
| ID | 134331 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Place |
| Place | Not Preserved Church |
| Case Study | The Process of Byzantinization in the Central Balkans (Late 10th – Mid-13th Century) |
| Dedication | Saint Petka/Paraskevi |
| Denomination | Orthodox |
| Evidence | Charter |
| Administrative unit | Region of Pelagonia / Пелагониски регион |
| Historical place | Serbian Empire , Byzantine Empire |
Description
The Church of St. Petka is mentioned in the First (Treskavac 1, 1334/1335) and Second (Treskavac 2, 1343/1344) Charters of Serbian King Dušan (1331-1355) to the Treskavac Monastery. In the first charter, it is mentioned as a monastic metochion, while in the second charter, it is stated to belong to the monastery.
Dating: before 1334/1335
Relations
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 1 | Source | After the conquest of the town of Prilep and its surrounding area, King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a Slavonic charter in 1334/35 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He donated villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches as well as a fair in the town of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |