Begin 01.09.1343
End 31.08.1345
End 31.08.1345
Properties
ID | 1235 |
---|---|
System Class | Place |
Place | Settlement Site agridion selište |
Case Study | Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
Administrative unit | North Macedonia , Region of Pelagonia / Пелагониски регион |
Historical place | Kingdom of Serbia |
Description
King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated the settlement site of Kostěnьče to the Monastery of Treskavec (tь sь selištemь Kostěnьčemь drumomь koi grěde vь Bělevo). The localisation follows the proposal of Kravari. In the year 1344/45 King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan mentioned the settlement of Kostence in a boundary description of Dupijačani (prěslopь, selište Kostěnče, drumomь u Bělevo).
Relations
Events (1)
Name | Class | Begin | End | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Donation of Kostěnьče | Acquisition | King Steven Uroš IV Dušan donated the settlement site of Kostěnьče to the Monastery of Treskavec (tь sь selištemь Kostěnьčemь drumomь koi grěde vь Bělevo). The localisation follows the proposal of Kravari. |
Sources (2)
Name | Class | Description |
---|---|---|
Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |