Maps of Power

Donation of Mogilica, Watermill

Begin 01.09.1343
End 31.08.1344

Properties

ID 4533
System Class Acquisition
Case Study Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16
Event Donation

Description

King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated the watermill of Mogilica to the Monastery of Treskavec (Selište Mogylica sь nivijemь, sь voděnicijemь, sь livadijemь, sь topili i sь vsěmi pravinami).

Relations

Events (1)
Name Class Begin End Description
Confirmation of Mogilica Acquisition King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan confirmed the donation of Mogilica with meadows, watermills, fields and all rights (Selište Mogylica sь nivijemь, sь voděnicijemь, sь livadijemь, sь topili i sь vsěmi pravinami). Mogilica was not named as village in the charter of 1343/44, but as selište. It seems to be more likely that Mogilica was just reduced in size than abandoned. Mogilica is mentioned a second time in the charter of 1343/44 (Selište Mo(gy)lica sь ljudmi, sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady, sь voděnicijemь, sь perivolemь, sь vsěmi pravinami).
Places (1)
Name Class Begin End Description
Mogilica, Watermill Place King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated the watermill of Mogilica to the Monastery of Treskavec (Selište Mogylica sь nivijemь, sь voděnicijemь, sь livadijemь, sь topili i sь vsěmi pravinami).
Actors (2)
Name Class Begin End Relation Type Description
Monastery of Treskavec Group
Stefan Uroš IV Dušan Person Stefan Dušan, also called Stefan Uroš IV, English Stephen Dushan, or Stephen Uroš IV (born 1308—died Dec. 20, 1355) king of Serbia (1331–46) and “Emperor of the Serbs, Greeks, and Albanians” (1346–55), the greatest ruler of medieval Serbia, who promoted his nation’s influence and gave his people a new code of laws.
Sources (1)
Name Class Description
Treskavac 2 Source The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3).