Properties
| ID | 121236 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Person |
| Case Study | Byzantino-Serbian Border Zones in Transition (1282–1355) , Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Sex | Male |
Description
Mentioned in the second and third charter (1343/1345) of the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan for the Monastery of Treskavec. The sources denote him as protonobelissimos (protonevelisima Kondolea). The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated a 204 kьbьl field in Vinci, which belonged to Golom, to the Treskavec Monastery. The property in the vicinity of the field was held by Konьdolejь (Niva u Vincehь Golomova kьblomь sd. mь blizь protonevelisima Kondolea i pri Gorgusě).
literature
Jireček 1912 — I, 26 , Kravari 1989 — 347 , Novaković 1909 — 22-23 , Slaveva/Mošin 1981 — 115, art. 15. 150, art. 71 , Smolčić-Makuljević 2016a — 79-80Relations
Actors (2)
| Name | Class | Begin | End | Relation Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byzantines | Group | πρωτονωβελλίσσιμος/Protonobelissimos/Protonevelesimь | |||
| Greeks | Group | πρωτονωβελλίσσιμος/Protonobelissimos/Protonevelesimь |
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |