Properties
| ID | 121397 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Person |
| Case Study | Byzantino-Serbian Border Zones in Transition (1282–1355) , Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Sex | Male |
Description
Mentioned in the first (1334/1336) and second charter (1343/1345) of the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan for the Monastery of Treskavec. He bought the deserted village Kalugerьcь. The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated his bought village with a field, grove and summer pasture to the Treskavec Monastery (Selište pusto Kalugerьcь, što je kupenica Pasarelova, sь nivijemь i sь dubravomь i sь planinomь).
literature
Adžievski 1997 — 23 , Jovanović 1935 — 323-324 , Kravari 1989 — 277-278 , Purković 1939/40 — 100 , Slaveva/Mošin 1981 — 82, art. 13. 120, art. 57 , Slaveva/Mošin 1988 — 108Relations
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 1 | Source | After the conquest of the town of Prilep and its surrounding area, King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a Slavonic charter in 1334/35 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He donated villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches as well as a fair in the town of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |