Maps of Power

Donation of Sveti Dimitrie, Watermill

Begin 01.09.1343
End 31.08.1344

Properties

ID 4619
System Class Acquisition
Case Study Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16
Event Donation

Description

Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated a watermill of the Metochion of Sveti Dimitrie to the Monastery of Treskavec (Vь gradě motohь Svetyi Dimitrie (Misinopolitivь panagirь za dušnica Misinopolitovihь dětei sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady, sь voděnicijemь, sь vsěmi pravinami)).

Relations

Events (1)
Name Class Begin End Description
Confirmation of the Metochion Saint Demetrius II Acquisition King Steven Uroš IV Dušan confirmed the donation of the Metochion of Saint Demetrius with its rights and vineyards in the year 1343/44 (Metohь Svetyi Dimitrije sь vsami pravinami, sь nivijemь, sь vinogradijemь, sь kupeničijemь i zadušninomь i sь brьdomь).
Actors (2)
Name Class Begin End Relation Type Description
Monastery of Treskavec Group
Stefan Uroš IV Dušan Person Stefan Dušan, also called Stefan Uroš IV, English Stephen Dushan, or Stephen Uroš IV (born 1308—died Dec. 20, 1355) king of Serbia (1331–46) and “Emperor of the Serbs, Greeks, and Albanians” (1346–55), the greatest ruler of medieval Serbia, who promoted his nation’s influence and gave his people a new code of laws.
Places (1)
Name Class Begin End Description
Prilep, Sveti Dimitrie, Watermill Place Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated a watermill of the Metochion of Sveti Dimitrie to the Monastery of Treskavec (Vь gradě motohь Svetyi Dimitrie (Misinopolitivь panagirь za dušnica Misinopolitovihь dětei sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady, sь voděnicijemь, sь vsěmi pravinami)).
Sources (1)
Name Class Description
Treskavac 2 Source The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3).