Begin 01.09.1334
End 31.08.1345
End 31.08.1345
Properties
| ID | 1182 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Place |
| Place | Fair |
| Case Study | Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Administrative unit | Region of Pelagonia / Пелагониски регион , North Macedonia |
| Historical place | Kingdom of Serbia |
Description
King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated, together with the Metochion of Saint Demetrius in Prilep, a fair in the vicinity of this metochion (Metohь Svetii Dimitrїe u Prilěpě, što priložihu Misinopolitova dětьca, sь nivijemь i sь vinogradi i sь voděnicami i sь Kučьkověne selištemь i sь panagiromь i sь vьseju pravinoju togo). King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan confirmed in 1343/44 the donation of the fair near the Metochion of Saint Demetrius in Prilep (Vь gradě motohь Svetyi Dimitrie (Misinopolitivь panagirь za dušnica Misinopolitovihь dětei sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady, sь voděnicijemь, sь vsěmi pravinami). In the year 1344/45 the King confirmed the donation of the fair, which was localised near to the Jewish quarter (Panigirište, počьnь ōtь Dola Evrěiska svěne dvorišta Arseneva, do dvora Petralětova i do urvišta Svetye Varvary).
Relations
Events (3)
| Name | Class | Begin | End | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmation of Prilep, Fair | Acquisition | King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan confirmed in 1343/44 the donation of the fair near the Metochion of Saint Demetrius in Prilep (Vь gradě motohь Svetyi Dimitrie (Misinopolitivь panagirь za dušnica Misinopolitovihь dětei sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady, sь voděnicijemь, sь vsěmi pravinami)). | ||
| Donation of Prilep, Fair | Acquisition | King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated, together with the Metochion of Saint Demetrius in Prilep, a fair in the vicinity of this metochion (Metohь Svetii Dimitrїe u Prilěpě, što priložihu Misinopolitova dětьca, sь nivijemь i sь vinogradi i sь voděnicami i sь Kučьkověne selištemь i sь panagiromь i sь vьseju pravinoju togo). | ||
| Second confirmation of Prilep, Fair | Acquisition | In the year 1344/45 the King confirmed the donation of the fair, which was localised near to the Jewish quarter (Panigirište, počьnь ōtь Dola Evrěiska svěne dvorišta Arseneva, do dvora Petralětova i do urvišta Svetye Varvary). |
Sources (3)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 1 | Source | After the conquest of the town of Prilep and its surrounding area, King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a Slavonic charter in 1334/35 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He donated villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches as well as a fair in the town of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |