Obršani, Орбшани
End 31.08.1345
Properties
ID | 894 |
---|---|
System Class | Place |
Place | Existing Village chorion selo |
Case Study | Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
Administrative unit | Region of Pelagonia / Пелагониски регион , North Macedonia |
Historical place | Kingdom of Serbia |
Description
King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated a watermill in the village of Ōbrьšani (i drugo voděničьje u Ōbrьšanehь dvě ōcě). In the year 1343/44 King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan confirmed the donation of Ōbrьšani with a vineyard, watermill and all its rights (Selo Ōbrьšani sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady, sь voděnicijemь, sь livadami, sь vsěmi pravinami sela togo). It is mentioned a second time when Dušan confirmed additional watermills near Ōbrьšani to the Monastery of Treskavec (Vь Ōbrьšanehь .v. voděnici, što je dalь Berivoi za duštu i voděnica podь svetu crьkvu što je zajedno sь Runьzeremь). In the year 1344/45 King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan confirmed the donation of the village of Ōbrьšani with vineyards, mills and all its rights to the Monastery of Treskavec (selo Ōbrьšani s niviemь, s vinogradi, s mlini, s livadami, sь vsěmi pravinami).
Relations
Events (3)
Name | Class | Begin | End | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Confirmation of Ōbrьšani | Acquisition | In the year 1343/44 King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan confirmed the donation of Ōbrьšani with a vineyard, watermill and all its rights (Selo Ōbrьšani sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady, sь voděnicijemь, sь livadami, sь vsěmi pravinami sela togo). It is mentioned a second time when Dušan confirmed additional watermills near Ōbrьšani to the Monastery of Treskavec (Vь Ōbrьšanehь .v. voděnici, što je dalь Berivoi za duštu i voděnica podь svetu crьkvu što je zajedno sь Runьzeremь). | ||
Donation of Ōbrьšani | Acquisition | King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan donated a watermill in the village of Ōbrьšani (i drugo voděničьje u Ōbrьšanehь dvě ōcě). | ||
Second confirmation of Ōbrьšani | Acquisition | In the year 1344/45 King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan confirmed the donation of the village of Ōbrьšani with vineyards, mills and all its rights to the Monastery of Treskavec (selo Ōbrьšani s niviemь, s vinogradi, s mlini, s livadami, sь vsěmi pravinami). |
Sources (3)
Name | Class | Description |
---|---|---|
Treskavac 1 | Source | After the conquest of the town of Prilep and its surrounding area, King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a Slavonic charter in 1334/35 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He donated villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches as well as a fair in the town of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |