Maps of Power

Bivolь Brodь

Bivol Brodь, Бивол Брод, Биволь Бродь

Begin 01.01.1343
End 30.04.1348

Description

The locality of Bivol Brod is attested in two sources. In the second charter for the Monastery of Treskavec, where the donation of village Krpeno is described, Bivol Brod is also mentioned. The site lay on the imperial road (basilike hodos) from Polatic (Treskavec 2, 121, art. 59: Selo vь Poloze Krьpeno, metohь Svety Nikola, što priloži svety kralь, sь nivijemь, sь vinogrady...i do careva druma koi ide ōdь Polaticь na Bivol Brodь). In the General Charter for the Monastery of Hilandar the site Bivol Brod is named in connection with the delimitation of the village Mlačice (Opšta hilandarska gramota, 439: (Mlačice sь zemlomь, što je dalь svety kralь; a megja zemli toi ōdь Nikiforca kako grede putь na ōpogorь prězь livadu u Kraljevu Pekь I u Bivolь Brodь).

Relations

Events (1)
Name Class Begin End Description
Confirmation of Posessions of the Monastery of Hilandar Acquisition The Emperor Stefan Uroš IV Dušan's deed for the Monastery of Hilandar, the so-called General Charter. The Charter confirms previous donations and records the land-inventory of the monastery. Although the charter bears the date 1348, it is with the utmost probability not an original. Lidija Slaveva considers the charter to be a copy that was written after the year 1365.
Sources (2)
Name Class Description
Stefan Uroš IV Dušan's General Charter for the Monastery of Hilandar Source The Serbian Emperor Stefan Uroš IV Dušan's issued the so-called "General Charter (Opšta hrisovulja)" to the Monastery of Hilandar, through which he confirmed all previous donations and records of the land-inventory of the monastery. Although the charter bears the date 1348, it is with the utmost probability not an original. Lidija Slaveva considers the charter to be a copy that was written after the year 1365.
Treskavac 2 Source The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3).