Арбанаси
Begin 01.09.1334
End 31.08.1345
End 31.08.1345
Properties
| ID | 2006 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Place |
| Place | Settlement Site agridion selište |
| Case Study | Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Administrative unit | Region of Pelagonia / Пелагониски регион , North Macedonia |
| Historical place | Kingdom of Serbia |
Description
One half of Arbanasi (i ōdь Arbanasь polovinu) was donated by the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) to the Monastery of Treskavec in 1334/35. The settlement site (selište) of Arbanasi is also mentioned in the boundary description of Dupijačani in the year 1344/45 (ōbьemljušte Sorunь sь selištemь Arbanasi do Maloradi).
literature
Kravari 1989 — 232 , Purković 1939/40 — 58 , Slaveva/Mošin 1981 — 91, 144 , Taseva 1998 — 147Relations
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 1 | Source | After the conquest of the town of Prilep and its surrounding area, King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a Slavonic charter in 1334/35 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He donated villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches as well as a fair in the town of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |