Properties
| ID | 121510 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Person |
| Case Study | Byzantino-Serbian Border Zones in Transition (1282–1355) , Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Sex | Male |
Description
Mentioned in the second and third charter (1343/1345) of the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan for the Monastery of Treskavec. His property is mentioned in the boundary description of the Kovačevь’s courtyard (tako i sь Kovačevěmь dvorištemь blizь Andronika Arseně), the Saint Theodor’s metochion (Metohь u Prilěpě Svety Theōdori sь vsěmi pravinami; počinae megja ōtь Barove Crьkve... putemь na Vračevьcь do Elimske kukje i do megje Arseneve) and the fair (Panigirište, počьnь ōtь Dola Evrěiska svěne dvorišta Arseneva, do dvora Petralětova i do urvišta Svetye Varvary).
literature
Babić 1969a — 2, 6–9 , Babiḱ 1986 — 240 , Kravari 1989 — 320-321 , Slaveva/Mošin 1981 — 115, art. 14. 143, art. 3. 143, art. 4. 149, art. 70Relations
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |