Properties
| ID | 121696 |
|---|---|
| System Class | Person |
| Case Study | Byzantino-Serbian Border Zones in Transition (1282–1355) , Historical Region of Macedonia TIB 16 |
| Sex | Male |
Description
Mentioned in the second and third charter (1343/1345) of the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan for the Monastery of Treskavec. The boundary of his property is attested in the delimitation of a 45 kьbьl large field. This land probably between the village Horupanь and Krivogaštani was bestowed to the Treskavec Monastery by the Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (Niva kьblomь me. tužde plisiasь Grьlia i Stari Kladenьcь Dragovь i do Baru i do putě krivogaškego i do Starego Potoka do megju Bělkovu).
literature
Adžievski 1994 — 197, 198 , Daničić 1962 — I, 99 , Kravari 1989 — 267, 287 , Schmid/Popović/Breier 2017 — 296 , Slaveva/Mošin 1981 — 116, art. 21. 150, art. 77Relations
Sources (2)
| Name | Class | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treskavac 2 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a second Slavonic charter in 1343/44 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |
| Treskavac 3 | Source | The Serbian King Stefan Uroš IV Dušan (reigned 1331-1355) issued a third Slavonic charter in 1344/45 for the Monastery of Treskavec to the North of Prilep. He confirmed current properties and donated further villages, settlements, abandoned lands, summer and winter pastures, watermills and mills, a mine, metochia and churches in the region of Prilep to the monastery. Božidar Ferjančić argued that the second charter (Treskavac 2) for the Monastery of Treskavec is a forgery, while the first and third (Treskavac 1 and 3) are authentic. Djordje Bubalo advanced the opinion that the second charter (Treskavac 2) is an unofficial document based on the first and the third charter (Treskavac 1 and 3). |